News

Animal Party lambasts BirdLife Cyprus for not attending anti-Elam protest

Cyprus Mail · 2026-09-19

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: The Animal Party criticized BirdLife Cyprus for not attending a protest against Elam's proposal to discuss environmental activists at a House environment committee meeting. • Why it matters: The absence of BirdLife Cyprus raises concerns about the commitment of environmental organizations to collaborate and support each other in advocacy efforts, particularly in the face of political challenges. • What to watch next: Monitor the ongoing tensions between environmental activists and hunting interests in Cyprus, as well as any responses from BirdLife Cyprus regarding their decision not to participate in the protest.

**Animal Party Criticizes BirdLife Cyprus for Protest Absence**

The Animal Party has publicly criticized BirdLife Cyprus for its absence from a recent protest against the far-right political party Elam, which is facing scrutiny for its proposal to discuss “environmental activists and the phenomena surrounding them” at an upcoming House environment committee meeting. The protest took place on September 16 outside the parliament.

In a statement released on Saturday, the Animal Party expressed disappointment with BirdLife Cyprus, stating that prior to the protest, party leader Kyriacos Kyriacou reached out to the organization to encourage its participation. According to the Animal Party, BirdLife Cyprus communicated that it had decided not to attend, citing concerns about its public image and the anticipated turnout at the protest.

The Animal Party questioned the reasoning behind BirdLife Cyprus's decision, asking, “Since when is the defence of the environment, wildlife, and those fighting against poaching measured in numbers?” They emphasized that the absence of BirdLife Cyprus was particularly concerning given that 18 civil society organizations had collectively signed a letter to parliament regarding the issues at hand.

The criticism highlighted the perceived contradiction in BirdLife Cyprus's stance, as the organization had previously expressed dissatisfaction over not being invited to the environment committee meeting. The Animal Party remarked that the situation raises important questions about the commitment of organizations tasked with wildlife protection when they choose not to align themselves with other civil society groups advocating for environmental issues.

The statement from the Animal Party further elaborated on the implications of BirdLife Cyprus's absence, stressing that it undermines the collective voice of those advocating for environmental activism. “We cannot ask for our voice to be heard inside parliament while simultaneously being absent when the public is outside parliament defending environmental activism,” the statement read.

The protest was organized in response to concerns that the discussion led by Elam could shift focus from poaching and illegal bird trapping to a critique of activists who report such illegal activities. This sentiment was echoed during the committee session, where Akel MP Yiorgos Loukaides accused Elam’s chairman of deliberately targeting environmental organizations, claiming that they were not given a fair opportunity to defend themselves.

During the same session, Pantelis Hadjiyerou, the chief of the game service, claimed that legal hunters were being “terrorized” by activists. This statement was met with criticism, as it suggested a narrative that could potentially vilify those advocating for wildlife protection.

The ongoing tensions between environmental activists and hunting interests in Cyprus have been a point of contention, with various stakeholders voicing their opinions on the balance between conservation efforts and hunting practices. The Animal Party's criticism of BirdLife Cyprus underscores the complexities within the environmental advocacy community, particularly in the face of political challenges.

As the debate continues, the Animal Party remains firm in its stance that collaboration among organizations is essential for effective advocacy and protection of wildlife. The absence of BirdLife Cyprus from the protest has sparked discussions about the responsibilities of environmental organizations in supporting one another, especially during critical moments when public awareness and activism are needed most.

Source: Cyprus Mail
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
News

Israeli strikes in Gaza kill at least three people — Cyprus Mail - UA.NEWS

• What happened: Israeli airstrikes in the Gaza Strip have killed at least three individuals amid ongoing regional tensions. • Why it matters: The strikes hig...

News

Uefa defends draw policy after Ireland request, Israel dismisses FAI comments

• What happened: Uefa has rejected the Football Association of Ireland's request to avoid future matchups with Israel, stating that team pairings are deter...

News

Manzambi, Jackson and Buendia fire Villa to first win as Spurs’ misery deepens

• What happened: Aston Villa secured their first Premier League win of the season with a 3-2 victory over Tottenham Hotspur, featuring goals from Johan Manzambi...

News

Luxembourg launches investigation after drones temporarily suspend flight operations

• What happened: Luxembourg Airport temporarily suspended flight operations due to the sighting of unauthorized drones, resulting in 19 diverted flights. • Wh...

News

Israeli strikes kill three people in Gaza, medics say

• What happened: Israeli airstrikes in the Gaza Strip killed at least three Palestinians, including Basir Al-Bursh, the son of the territory's health minis...

News

Animal Party criticizes BirdLife Cyprus over protest absence - UA.NEWS

• What happened: The Animal Party of Cyprus criticized BirdLife Cyprus for not participating in a recent protest in Nicosia aimed at raising awareness about ani...