Russia

EU migration vote exposes deep divisions within bloc

RT English · 2026-06-18

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: The European Parliament voted to toughen migration rules, including expedited deportation of rejected asylum seekers, revealing significant divisions between right-wing and left-wing MEPs. • Why it matters: This legislation, proposed by the European Commission in response to public dissatisfaction with illegal migration, reflects a shift towards stricter immigration policies among EU member states, potentially impacting the bloc's internal cohesion. • What to watch next: The final approval of the legislation by member states will determine the implementation of new measures, including extended detention periods and the establishment of "return hubs" in non-EU countries, as the debate over migration continues.

**Title: EU Migration Vote Exposes Deep Divisions Within Bloc**

In a significant move that underscores the growing divide within the European Union, the European Parliament voted on Wednesday to toughen migration rules across the bloc. The legislation, which aims to expedite the deportation of rejected asylum seekers, was originally proposed by the European Commission in response to increasing public dissatisfaction with the ongoing influx of illegal migrants.

The issue of migration has been a contentious topic within the EU since the 2015 migrant crisis, when approximately one million people entered the bloc. A recent study by a Berlin-based organization, utilizing Eurostat and UN data, indicates that by 2025, the EU's migrant population is projected to reach a record 64.2 million, with around 46.7 million individuals born outside the union.

The recent vote, which passed with 418 votes in favor and 218 against, along with 30 abstentions, saw a coalition of center-right and right-wing parties come together. The center-right European People’s Party (EPP) aligned with the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), as well as the far-right groups Patriots for Europe (PfE) and Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN).

Right-wing French Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Francois-Xavier Bellamy praised the outcome, calling it a “historic step for Europe” and a demonstration that change is achievable. Conversely, members of the left-wing factions expressed strong opposition to the new measures. Alessandro Zan from the Socialists and Democrats group (S&D) characterized the tightening of immigration laws as a “dark chapter for Europe.” S&D Vice-President Ana Catarina Mendes echoed this sentiment, warning that the regulation could normalize practices that were previously considered unacceptable within the EU.

If the legislation receives final approval from member states, it will empower national authorities with increased capabilities to search the homes of illegal migrants and confiscate their personal belongings. Additionally, the maximum detention period for foreign nationals awaiting deportation would be extended from six months to two years, with the possibility of a further six-month extension for certain cases. Individuals deemed a security risk could face indefinite detention.

The new rules also propose the establishment of "return hubs" in non-EU countries, where rejected asylum seekers could be transferred if their return to their home countries is not feasible. This concept has garnered interest from several EU nations, including Denmark, Austria, Greece, Germany, and the Netherlands, all of which have been considering similar measures.

The shift in migration policy is particularly notable in countries like Germany and Sweden, which had previously championed open-door policies. Both nations have recently tightened their asylum regulations, reflecting a broader trend among EU member states toward stricter immigration controls.

As the debate over migration continues to unfold, the recent vote in the European Parliament highlights the deep ideological rifts within the EU, as member states grapple with the challenges posed by migration and public sentiment surrounding the issue. The outcome of this legislation could have lasting implications for the EU's approach to migration and its internal cohesion.

Source: RT English
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
Russia

Macron doubts effectiveness of US actions in war with Iran

• What happened: French President Emmanuel Macron expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of U.S. military actions against Iran, suggesting that the goals ...

Russia

US biolabs, 'destructive response' to possible NATO aggression: MFA statements

• What happened: Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova accused the United States of conducting research on atypical diseases in biolabs located i...

Russia

Moscow protesters brand UK ‘sponsor of terror’ (VIDEO)

• What happened: Over 500 activists protested outside the British ambassador's residence in Moscow, accusing the UK of being a "sponsor of terrorism&q...

Russia

Putin's working program at Russia-ASEAN summit lasted more than 15 hours

• What happened: Russian President Vladimir Putin concluded a two-day working program at the Russia-ASEAN summit in Kazan, which included over 15 hours of publi...

Russia

Singapore PM asked Putin to talk about special military operation at summit — Kremlin aide

• What happened: Singapore's Prime Minister Lawrence Wong requested Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss the progress of the special military operat...

Russia

Israel severs contact with EU’s Kallas over reported apartheid remarks

• What happened: Israel has announced it will sever all contact with EU diplomat Kaja Kallas following her reported comparison of Israel to apartheid-era South ...