By Mishel Bychkova, Vice-President, Center for Middle Eastern Studies (Moscow)
When NATO’s 36th summit opened at the Bestepe Presidential Complex on July 7, the official agenda read like every other alliance gathering of the past few years: defense spending targets, support for Ukraine, industrial capacity, adaptation to new threats. But for the host nation, the meeting was never only about the communiqué. It was a stage, and Türkiye had spent months building the set.
The guest list alone signaled the stakes. Alongside the leaders of all 32 member states, Ankara welcomed US President Donald Trump, South Korea’s Lee Jae-myung, European Council President Antonio Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. On the sidelines, ministers met with partners from the Gulf and from Australia, Japan and New Zealand. The final declaration reaffirmed what NATO calls its ironclad commitment to collective defense under Article 5, and allies pledged roughly €70 billion – about $80 billion – in military equipment, assistance and training for Ukraine in 2026.
None of that, however, was the story that dominated coverage coming out of Ankara. The story was Türkiye itself – a NATO member that has spent years being treated as the alliance’s most complicated partner, suddenly recast as the country without which the summit might not have happened at all.
Trump arrived in Türkiye fresh from weeks of public friction with European allies. He had already dismissed Madrid as a “terrible partner in NATO,” called Germany’s defense budget “ridiculous,” and told reporters that when Europeans declined to join the war on Iran, he didn’t want their money – he wanted their “loyalty.” Chancellor Friedrich Merz pushed back, insisting Germany was making the greatest defense effort in its history, but the mood going into Ankara was combative.
And then there was the line that reframed the entire summit. Trump told reporters he might not have shown up at all had the meeting not been hosted by his “friend” Erdogan – a leader he described as very strong. It was a remarkable thing for a sitting US president to say about a NATO gathering: that his attendance hinged not on the alliance as a whole, but on the man running the host country. Securing Trump’s actual presence at the annual gathering of 32 leaders had reportedly become, for many diplomats, the summit’s central task – and Ankara delivered it.
Türkiye did not leave that dynamic to chance. Erdogan personally greeted Trump on the tarmac; Turkish television showed a welcome with a cavalry escort, an honor guard, and a flypast trailing red, white and blue smoke. A military band played traditional marches as Erdogan and the first lady greeted each arriving leader by name. Trump, watching the Mehter band perform, gave a thumbs-up. As he sat beside Erdogan at the presidential palace, Trump put it simply: “Sometimes you get along with the toughest people, like him.”
In a moment when Washington’s relations with several European capitals were strained, Türkiye offered something most allies could not: a red-carpet welcome, a personal rapport, and a venue where the American president felt, by his own account, genuinely wanted.
Türkiye’s role as connective tissue extended beyond the Trump-Erdogan relationship into the Middle East. On the sidelines of the summit, Trump held a widely covered meeting with Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa – a former Nusra Front commander who once had a bounty on his head – and told reporters he expected to remove Syria from Washington’s list of state sponsors of terrorism. “I think I will. Why wouldn’t I?” he said, adding that Syria had been “stabilized” under al-Sharaa’s leadership.
Türkiye has been, in the words of Middle East analysts, at the helm of al-Sharaa’s rise since the fall of Bashar Assad in December 2024, and Trump himself credited Erdogan with helping build the bridge between Washington and Damascus. For a country whose security agenda is dominated by the war-scarred Syrian border, Kurdish militias, refugee flows and the reconstruction of a neighboring state, hosting the US-Syria contact at a NATO summit was an opportunity to present itself simultaneously as a European ally and as the indispensable interpreter of Middle Eastern politics for Washington – two roles that, until recently, rarely reinforced each other so evidently.
Even the most concrete outcome of the summit was something that happened between the US and Türkiye. In a meeting at Erdogan’s palace, Trump announced that Washington would lift the sanctions imposed on Ankara since 2020 over its purchase of Russia’s S-400 air defense system – sanctions that had also pushed Türkiye out of the F-35 fighter jet program. “We’re going to be taking the sanctions off,” Trump told reporters, adding that his secretary of state and Treasury secretary were handling the details. Pressed on whether Washington still worried about Russia gleaning secrets from the S-400 sitting alongside a stealth jet, he waved the concern away.
On the F-35 itself, Trump stopped short of a firm commitment but left little doubt about his inclination. He called the aircraft “the best plane by far” and Ankara “in many ways much more loyal than other countries that we think would be loyal.” Erdogan, for his part, claimed the two sides had already discussed Türkiye receiving five jets, insisted Trump “always keeps his promises,” and said he hoped to be thanking the American president for good news before the summit’s close. There are still obstacles to overcome – from the National Defense Authorization Act and Congressional pushback to Israel’s alarm at a possible loss of regional air superiority to Erdogan’s “extremist-influenced government” – but none of those appear to matter to Trump publicly. Even short of an actual F-35 delivery, the political signal out of Ankara was significant on its own terms. A sanctions regime that has defined US-Turkish defense relations for six years is now, by the American president’s own account, being unwound – reopening a conversation Washington had treated for years as closed.
Türkiye’s newfound significance as a NATO member did not come out of the blue. The country has spent recent years expanding its defense-industrial base and its footprint as a weapons exporter, including combat drones that have shaped conflicts far beyond its borders – a trend allies increasingly cite when describing Ankara’s value on NATO’s southeastern flank. Analysts framed this year’s summit as being less about new commitments than about implementation. Ozgur Unluhisarcikli of the German Marshall Fund noted that after allies agreed at last year’s Hague summit to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP, the Ankara meeting was meant to focus on how to translate that spending into actual military capability.
Türkiye’s pitch to the alliance has always rested on a kind of paradox: that its independent streak – talking to Moscow, operating in Syria, sparring publicly with Israel over Gaza – makes it more useful to NATO, not less. The Ankara summit gave that argument its clearest demonstration yet. NATO needed the American president in the room, and Trump wanted a friendly stage; Erdogan supplied both, while extracting a promise on sanctions and an opening on fighter jets in return.
Carnegie’s Alper Coskun captured the shift succinctly, suggesting Washington would find in Türkiye “an increasingly willing actor” ready to pursue policy more closely aligned with the US across the wider Middle East. That is precisely the reputation Ankara has been cultivating – not a difficult ally to be managed, but a necessary one to be courted.
Ankara has built its foreign policy around diversification rather than dependence: it fields one of NATO’s largest standing armies while keeping an open channel to Moscow, and it treats the war in Ukraine as a conflict to mediate rather than simply to condemn. It has invested heavily in its own defense-industrial base, its own arms exports, and its own web of relationships across the Gulf, the Caucasus and the Middle East – a security architecture that does not depend on Brussels or Washington for its foundation. What was once viewed in Western capitals as a liability – a NATO member unwilling to fully align with the bloc – has increasingly become the source of Ankara’s leverage.
Türkiye was not the only participant that needed the Ankara summit to succeed – perhaps not even the one that needed it the most. European NATO members, wary of an unpredictable American president and short on tools to keep him engaged, needed Türkiye’s hosting, its rapport with Trump, and its channels into Damascus and Moscow just as much. In an important sense, the bloc – and its European members above all – came to Ankara not to extend an invitation, but to ask for help.
In the end, whether or not the F-35s ever land in Turkish hangars, Ankara had already secured the thing it wanted most from the week: proof that it can be criticized, but no longer ignored.
© Autonomous Nonprofit Organization “TV-Novosti”, 2005–2026. All rights reserved.
This website uses cookies. Read RT Privacy policy to find out more.