World

India rejects Hague court order to restore Indus waters pact with Pakistan

Al Jazeera · 2026-08-31

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: India has rejected a ruling from the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague that ordered it to uphold the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan, asserting that the tribunal lacks jurisdiction over the matter. • Why it matters: The Indus Waters Treaty is crucial for Pakistan's agricultural sector, and India's suspension of the treaty has heightened tensions between the two countries, especially following a terrorist attack in Kashmir linked to Pakistan. • What to watch next: The international community is monitoring the situation closely, particularly the response from Pakistan and any potential escalations in tensions, as well as the upcoming decision from a World Bank-appointed neutral expert expected by July 2027.

**India Rejects Hague Court Order to Restore Indus Waters Pact with Pakistan**

**Published on August 31, 2026**

India has officially rejected a ruling from the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which mandated that India uphold the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan. The Indian government argues that the tribunal lacks jurisdiction over the matter, asserting its sovereign right to make decisions regarding its water resources.

The Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960, governs the distribution of water from the Indus River system, which is crucial for Pakistan's agricultural sector, supplying water to approximately 80 percent of its farmland. The treaty has historically been a significant framework for managing water resources between the two countries, even amid ongoing tensions, including three wars.

The current dispute escalated after India suspended the treaty in April 2025, following a terrorist attack in Kashmir that resulted in the deaths of 26 individuals. India identified two of the three assailants as Pakistani nationals, a claim that Pakistan has vehemently denied. This incident has heightened tensions between the two nations, with Kashmir remaining a central issue in their longstanding conflict.

In its recent ruling, the tribunal stated that the Indus Waters Treaty remains fully binding and that India had no valid justification for its suspension. The court ordered India to limit construction activities at the Ratle Hydro-Electric Plant in Kashmir, specifically prohibiting work on the dam wall and power intake structure beyond certain levels. These restrictions will remain effective until a World Bank-appointed neutral expert delivers a decision, expected by July 2027.

The Indian Ministry of External Affairs responded to the court's ruling by stating that it does not recognize the tribunal's authority and "categorically" rejects the verdict. The ministry emphasized that the court has no jurisdiction over India's sovereign decisions. "Its pronouncements, now or in the future, will have no effect on India’s actions in connection with the projects being undertaken by India," the statement read.

Pakistan, on the other hand, welcomed the tribunal's interim measures and expressed a commitment to explore ways to re-engage under the treaty's legal framework. The Pakistani government is currently reviewing the details of the ruling to determine its next steps.

The situation has sparked protests in Pakistan, where demonstrators have taken to the streets carrying flags and banners in opposition to India's suspension of the treaty. The public outcry reflects the importance of the Indus Waters Treaty for Pakistan, particularly in light of its reliance on the river system for agricultural productivity and overall water security.

As the dispute continues, the international community is closely monitoring the developments, particularly given the historical significance of the Indus Waters Treaty as a mechanism for cooperation between India and Pakistan. The ongoing tensions surrounding Kashmir and water resources underscore the challenges both nations face in maintaining diplomatic relations while addressing critical issues of national security and resource management.

The rejection of the Hague court's ruling by India marks a significant moment in the ongoing saga of the Indus Waters Treaty, raising questions about the future of water-sharing agreements in the region and the potential for further escalation of tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors.

Source: Al Jazeera
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
World

Nepal rescuers blast hillside in search of hydropower workers as families wait anxiously

• What happened: Rescuers in Nepal are using explosives to access mud-filled tunnels where over 600 workers are believed to be trapped following severe flooding...

World

Principal who saved 900 students recalls Nepal’s devastating flood

• What happened: Principal Rajendra Dawadi evacuated over 900 students from his school during devastating floods in Nepal, which have resulted in over 900 death...

World

Vance says Trump ‘sending a message’ to Iran with AI-generated video

• What happened: U.S. Vice President JD Vance stated that an AI-generated video shared by President Trump serves as a warning to Iran regarding its aggressive a...

World

Photos: Nearly 1,000 dead, thousands missing in Nepal–China border floods

• What happened: Devastating floods near the Nepal-China border have resulted in at least 939 confirmed deaths in Nepal, with thousands more missing, including ...

World

Iran could face economic collapse in months, US Treasury’s Bessent warns

• What happened: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned that Iran could face economic collapse within weeks or months due to newly imposed sanctions and ong...

World

US singer D4vd's celebrity lawyers withdraw from murder case

• What happened: Celebrity lawyers for US musician D4vd, real name David Anthony Burke, have withdrawn from his murder case, leading to the appointment of a pub...