World

Iran and Oman agree route for ships in Strait of Hormuz, Tehran says

Euronews World · 2026-08-05

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: Iran and Oman have finalized an agreement on a shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz, asserting that the US was not involved in the negotiations. • Why it matters: This agreement is significant as the Strait of Hormuz is a critical passage for global oil trade, and Iran's insistence on charging fees for passage challenges international norms regarding free navigation. • What to watch next: Observers should monitor the US's response to the agreement and any potential changes in its naval presence in the region, as well as the implications for global oil markets and regional security dynamics.

By Nathan Rennolds & Peter Barabas Published on 05/08/2026 - 18:14 GMT+2•Updated 19:27 Share Comments Add Euronews on Google Share Facebook Twitter Flipboard Send Reddit Linkedin Messenger Telegram VK Bluesky Threads Whatsapp Tehran has announced that Iran and Oman have agreed on the geographic route for shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, claiming that the US was not involved in the agreement. At the same time, the US President has claimed Hormuz negotiations with Iran are “moving along very nicely”. Iran and Oman on Wednesday finalised an agreement on what Tehran calls the geographical coordinates of a proposed shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz. ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Iran and Oman are preparing a joint statement on the agreement which includes technical, legal, security and environmental points. Separately, Iranian media quoted official sources saying that the reopening of the Strait would depend on the US ending its naval blockade of the country's ports. The key aspect of such an agreement revolves around Tehran’s insistence to charge fees for passage as it claims sovereign control of the key waterway, in direct opposition with the United States and the Gulf countries who insist that navigation must remain free as stipulated by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. “Provided that certain third parties do not obstruct the process, a joint statement by the two countries outlining the main considerations and points agreed upon is also being reviewed and finalized,” Baghaei said referring to the US as a “third party”. Baghaei however underlined that the Iran-Oman agreement in itself cannot guarantee the safety of navigation through Hormuz as long as “the US naval blockade and other actions against Iran and its interests remain in place.” Tehran’s announcement comes amid several days of intense speculation on the two-month long negotiations between Iran and Oman, which Tehran insists are in line with the Memorandum of Understanding signed with the United States in June. Contradictory comments on US-Iran talks Earlier on Wednesday, Iranian state television reported that the Iran-Oman talks focus on setting up a “middle corridor” through the Strait of Hormuz, to be controlled by the two countries. Another Iranian state media outlet reported that the agreement would not immediately result in the reopening of the strait due to what Tehran calls “US violations”, and that the negotiations “have nothing to do with the United States”. “The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz depends on a change in US behaviour and the correction of its violations,” state TV channel IRIB said. However, US President Donald Trump insisted in an interview with US broadcaster Fox News on Tuesday night that the US is part of the Hormuz negotiations, which are “moving along very nicely”. “The Strait is going to be open very soon, or they are going to get hit very hard, and then the strait is going to be open,” Trump said. The waterway, a crucial energy transit chokepoint that carries roughly a quarter of the global seaborne oil trade, was effectively closed by Iran after US and Israeli strikes in late February, sparking wild swings in energy markets. Former head of Israel’s military intelligence research department Danny Citrinowicz commented on X that “from day one, it was clear that restoring the Strait of Hormuz to its pre-crisis status would have required either regime change in Iran or a sustained military effort to impose control over the waterway.” “Neither option was politically or strategically acceptable to Washington, given the enormous costs and long-term commitments they would require. Sometimes, the least desirable option is the only realistic one,” Citrinowicz said. Go to accessibility shortcuts Share Comments Add Euronews on Google news

Source: Euronews World
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
World

Malaysia vows not to return Rohingya refugees to Myanmar if lives at risk

• What happened: Malaysia announced it will not repatriate 5,000 Rohingya refugees to Myanmar if their safety cannot be ensured, following discussions led by Pr...

World

US law enforcement reports deadly mass shooting in North Carolina

• What happened: A mass shooting occurred in Prospect Hill, North Carolina, resulting in multiple fatalities and one person hospitalized with a gunshot wound, a...

World

After deadly Kyiv strike, Ukraine warns interceptor shortage is costing lives

• What happened: A massive aerial attack by Russia on Kyiv resulted in 21 deaths and numerous injuries, with Ukraine's air defenses unable to intercept any...

World

Is the conflict between Russia and Ukraine deepening?

• What happened: The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has intensified, with a significant increase in missile and drone attacks resulting in civilian casualt...

World

Photos: Israeli forces raid occupied West Bank’s Qalandiya refugee camp

• What happened: Israeli forces conducted a military raid in the Qalandiya refugee camp, resulting in injuries to eight individuals and the arrest of at least 2...

World

El-Sayed wins Michigan Democratic Senate primary

• What happened: Abdul El-Sayed won Michigan's Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate, narrowly defeating Rep. Haley Stevens. • Why it matters: El-Sayed&...