**Justice Ministry Defends Dismissal of Prison Guard Amid Union Concerns**
The Ministry of Justice in Cyprus has issued a statement defending its decision to dismiss prison guard Giorgos Maltezos, asserting that the termination was based solely on findings from a disciplinary procedure rather than any implications of trade unionism. This response comes after the political party Akel raised concerns regarding the potential infringement of trade union freedoms following Maltezos's dismissal.
Maltezos, who serves as the vice president and press secretary of the prison officers' branch of the Isotita trade union, had recently made allegations regarding the conditions within the prisons department and had publicly criticized both the leadership of the department and Justice Minister Costas Fitiris. His dismissal has prompted Akel to question whether the Ministry of Justice and the Prison Directorate have upheld their responsibilities concerning respect for trade union freedoms in the country.
In its statement, the Ministry emphasized that the decision to terminate Maltezos's employment was not related to his union activities but rather to his failure to comply with the legal and regulatory framework governing the operations of the prison department. The ministry noted that investigators had found evidence of "repeated noncompliance with official instructions and decisions of the Prisons Department," including instances where Maltezos was "systematically absent from his duties on specific days of the week."
Akel has expressed concerns about what it describes as "vindictive dismissals" of trade unionists, suggesting that such actions could undermine the rights of workers within the prison system. The party plans to bring the issue to the House Labour Committee, emphasizing the need for a discussion on the treatment of workers in the prison sector.
In response to these allegations, the Ministry of Justice stated that it respects trade unionism as mandated by the Constitution, Cypriot legislation, and international conventions. The ministry reiterated its commitment to discussing any issues related to workers' rights and trade union freedoms, indicating a willingness to engage with Akel on these matters.
The Ministry's statement concluded with a reminder that while trade union action is an inalienable right, it should not be conflated with noncompliance to legal obligations and official directives. The ministry underscored the importance of adhering to laws and regulations, asserting that no individual is above the established legal framework.
As the situation develops, the Ministry of Justice remains firm in its position, while Akel continues to advocate for the protection of trade union rights within the prison system. The case has sparked a broader conversation about the balance between maintaining order and compliance within public institutions and safeguarding the rights of workers to engage in union activities without fear of retaliation.