World

Khamenei’s MoU stance stirs debate as Iran and US meet in Switzerland

Al Jazeera · 2026-06-21

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: Senior negotiators from Iran and the United States are meeting in Switzerland to advance a memorandum of understanding aimed at ending the ongoing conflict initiated by the US and Israel in February. • Why it matters: The talks are significant as they represent a potential shift towards peace, but they are also contentious within Iran, with Supreme Leader Khamenei expressing reluctance about the MoU and facing opposition from hardline factions. • What to watch next: The enforcement of the MoU, particularly regarding military hostilities in Lebanon and the Strait of Hormuz, will be crucial, as will the internal political dynamics in Iran that could affect the negotiations.

SaveSharefacebookxwhatsapp-strokecopylinkIran-U.S. launch historic peace talks with 60-day roadmapBy Maziar MotamediPublished On 21 Jun 202621 Jun 2026Tehran, Iran – Senior negotiators from Iran and the United States are in Switzerland to advance the signed memorandum of understanding (MoU) to end the war launched by the US and Israel in late February.Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi led the Iranian delegation in Sunday’s high-level talks mediated by Pakistan and Qatar, with Vice President JD Vance heading the US team.But back in Tehran, opponents of the deal continued to argue about Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei’s reluctant stance on the MoU.“I, as a matter of principle, held a different view,” said a short written statement attributed to Khamenei on Thursday, in what has been his only public reaction to this week’s MoU with the US. But, he added, he approved it after President Masoud Pezeshkian accepted responsibility. On Sunday, the director general of the Islamic Republic of Iran News Network (IRINN), the main news channel of state television, resigned after the station broadcast a live interview with Mahmoud Nabavian, a hardline cleric, legislator and member of Iran’s negotiating team during an earlier round of talks in Pakistan in April.To rally backing for his opposition to the MoU, Nabavian read lines from what he claimed was correspondence between Khamenei and unnamed top officials in the Supreme National Security Council in March and April.Nabavian claimed the supreme leader was opposed to the ceasefire that started on April 8 since he wanted immediate enforcement of a tolling system for ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz and demanded “exclusive management” of the strategic waterway for Iran.Khamenei, who has not been seen or heard from publicly since becoming supreme leader in March, allegedly also wanted war reparations, the release of frozen assets and an absolute rejection of concessions over Iran’s nuclear programme.The interview with Nabavian ran for 11 minutes before being abruptly ended by the host. It could not be found in IRINN’s online archive on Sunday. Pezeshkian has called the text of the MoU a “historic document” that “reflects the voice of a nation that has not traded its dignity and independence for any threat or pressure”.The Supreme National Security Council released a statement saying it will safeguard “the rights of the Iranian nation and the resistance front”, while honouring the memory of leaders killed in the war. Khamenei’s father and former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed on the first day of the joint US-Israeli air attacks on February 28 .Lebanon factorMultiple political figures, including Tehran’s hardline Mayor Alireza Zakani, as well as state-linked media have attested in recent days that almost all members of the Supreme National Security Council, including military commanders, voted in favour of the MoU.Saeed Jalili, the ultra-hardline former chief negotiator and failed presidential candidate, is the only person said to have voted against the deal, which has offered some respite to global markets affected by the Strait of Hormuz disruption.Amir Hossein Sabeti, a hardline MP close to Jalili, told a gathering in Tehran on Saturday night that Pezeshkian, his ministers and Ghalibaf voted yes, while Jalili voted no since he believes Iran’s “national interests” are not realised through the deal.Sabeti said hawkish politicians are demanding answers from the government about the MoU since its first provision, which emphasised cessation of military hostilities on all fronts, including in Lebanon, is being repeatedly violated by Israel.On Saturday, Iran’s joint military command said the Strait of Hormuz was closed again because of Israel’s continued attacks on Lebanon, but the US military said the waterway remained open to all vessels.Iran’s ministry of foreign affairs stressed on Sunday that the first priority in Switzerland will be to ensure enforcement of the deal, especially in Lebanon, before technical talks can proceed towards potentially achieving a long-term resolution over the coming months. Nevertheless, anti-deal factions in Iran are utilising their broad access to state media as a weapon against any negotiations with the US.On Be Vaght-e Iran, a wartime state TV programme, said that along with the Strait of Hormuz, Tehran’s Mehrabad Airport must be closed to prevent Iranian negotiators leaving the country for talks with the “enemy”.Kian Abdollahi, the editor-in-chief of the Tasnim news agency linked with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said it was a “mistake” to send a large delegation to Switzerland while the MoU is not being enforced.“We are facing a time equation, and we can’t lose this time. Let’s say after 30 days, we act very revolutionary and bombard Israel with missiles. Then we will have lost a very important factor. The other side’s aim is only to offload some pressure over the Strait of Hormuz,” he said during a video interview.The government also appears to have been at odds with more hardline elements within the political establishment about the night-time gatherings of state supporters on the streets.Such rallies have repeatedly been used to project messaging against any deal with the US since the start of the war.Tehran lawmaker Ali Khezrian told state TV on Saturday that the strategic planning arm of the president’s office has adopted a document that delineates the rallies as “excitable rituals” that are contributing to “blocking diplomacy”.“These are the same people that have kept me and the likes of the people who wrote the government text in power,” he said, criticising the government for seeking an end to the rallies, which have been accompanied by armed motorcades and roadblocks, as well as loud religious music blasting from truck-mounted speakers.

Source: Al Jazeera
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
World

What’s next in the Strait of Hormuz crisis?

• What happened: Iranian armed forces announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz following Israeli attacks in Lebanon, just days after a U.S.-Iran agreement ...

World

US and Iran publicly trade threats as talks take place in Switzerland

• What happened: US President Donald Trump threatened military action against Iran if it does not curb Hezbollah's activities, while Iran's chief nego...

World

Ethiopian prime minister’s party easily wins parliamentary election

• What happened: Ethiopia's Prosperity Party, led by Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, has won a significant majority in the recent parliamentary elections, reinf...

World

Iran, US, Israel: Memorandum of misunderstanding?

• What happened: Diplomatic progress between Iran and the US is deemed unlikely, with skepticism expressed by Jeremy Scahill regarding the potential for meaning...

World

The looming Super El Nino

• What happened: A powerful Super El Niño is expected to peak in November 2023, potentially disrupting global weather patterns and threatening food supply chain...

World

India’s ‘Cockroach’ movement camps out until education minister resigns

• What happened: Supporters of the Cockroach Janta Party, a Gen Z political movement in India, are staging a protest in New Delhi demanding the resignation of t...