World

Netanyahu rejects Gaza withdrawal until Hamas disarms

Euronews World · 2026-08-04

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected a U.S.-backed proposal for Israel to withdraw from Gaza until Hamas fully disarms, despite ongoing efforts by the Trump administration to broker a ceasefire. • Why it matters: Netanyahu's firm stance raises concerns about the viability of peace negotiations and highlights the deep-seated mistrust between Israel and Hamas, complicating efforts to resolve the longstanding conflict. • What to watch next: Monitor developments in U.S.-Israel relations and any potential shifts in the Trump administration's approach to the conflict, especially as Netanyahu prepares for his reelection campaign in October.

**Netanyahu Rejects Gaza Withdrawal Until Hamas Disarms**

In a significant statement regarding the ongoing conflict in Gaza, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has firmly rejected a U.S.-backed proposal for Israel to withdraw from the territory until Hamas has fully disarmed. This development comes amid ongoing efforts by the Trump administration to broker a ceasefire and facilitate a resolution to the conflict.

On April 8, 2026, Netanyahu addressed the issue during a public statement, emphasizing that Israel's military presence in Gaza would continue until Hamas relinquishes its weapons. His remarks have raised concerns about the viability of a recent agreement proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump, which aimed to pave the way for peace and stability in the region.

The U.S.-backed deal, which emerged from a ceasefire agreement reached last October, called for a phased disarmament of Hamas, alongside a commitment from Israel to halt military strikes and begin withdrawing from approximately 60% of Gaza currently under its control. The agreement was seen as a potential breakthrough in the longstanding conflict, which has seen significant military operations and civilian casualties.

However, Netanyahu's comments have cast doubt on the prospects of this deal, highlighting a rare moment of friction between Israel and the Trump administration. "The Trump administration sent us a draft. We did not agree. It is not our draft," Netanyahu stated in a video posted on social media. He reiterated Israel's position that disarmament is a prerequisite for any withdrawal, asserting that Israeli forces would continue to take necessary actions to protect the nation and its citizens.

The Prime Minister's stance reflects a broader sentiment within Israel regarding security concerns tied to Hamas, which has been designated a terrorist organization by Israel and other countries. Netanyahu's insistence on disarmament as a condition for withdrawal underscores the complexities involved in negotiating peace in the region.

The agreement proposed by the Trump administration also included provisions for the deployment of an International Stabilization Force and the establishment of an independent Palestinian administration to oversee governance and reconstruction in Gaza. However, both sides have accused each other of violating the terms of the ceasefire, complicating efforts to reach a lasting resolution.

Hamas has maintained that Israel must cease its military operations and begin withdrawing from Gaza before any disarmament can take place. This impasse highlights the deep-seated mistrust and ongoing hostilities that have characterized the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for decades.

As Netanyahu prepares for a challenging reelection campaign in October, his firm stance on Gaza may resonate with constituents who prioritize national security. However, it also raises questions about the potential for diplomatic solutions and the future of U.S.-Israel relations under the current administration.

In summary, Netanyahu's rejection of the U.S.-backed Gaza withdrawal plan until Hamas disarms reflects the complexities of the ongoing conflict and the challenges faced in achieving a ceasefire. The situation remains fluid, with both sides entrenched in their positions, making the prospect of peace increasingly elusive.

Source: Euronews World
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
World

How the far right weaponised the Ceuta crisis

• What happened: More than 72 migrants died while attempting to reach Ceuta, leading to intense political debate and controversy, particularly among far-right f...

World

Projectile sinks Indian-flagged ship off Yemen coast

• What happened: An Indian-flagged vessel, the MSV Faize Noore Oliya, sank off the coast of Yemen after being hit by a projectile, but all 14 crew members were ...

World

Funeral for family killed in US strike on Iran’s Qeshm Island

• What happened: A funeral was held for a family, including a couple and their two-year-old child, killed in a US military strike on Iran’s Qeshm Island, prompt...

World

Death toll rises to 87 in India’s flood-stricken Assam

• What happened: The death toll from severe flooding in Assam, India, has risen to 87, with thousands displaced and living in makeshift shelters after relentles...

World

Six years on, Beirut blast families still await justice

• What happened: Families of victims of the Beirut port blast marked the sixth anniversary of the explosion, demanding truth and accountability amid ongoing del...

World

National Guard deployment to Washington, DC will cost US roughly $1.4bn

• What happened: The U.S. Department of Defense estimated that the extension of the National Guard deployment in Washington, DC, until January 2029 will cost ap...