**Paschalides Recommends Criminal Prosecutions in Videogate Affair**
Independent criminal investigator Andreas Paschalidis has confirmed his recommendation for criminal prosecutions against certain individuals implicated in the Videogate affair. This announcement comes in response to claims that his findings exonerated all parties involved, which he vehemently denies.
In a public statement released on Thursday, Paschalidis addressed the misconceptions surrounding his report, emphasizing that commentary on his findings has led to a false narrative of absolution for those connected to the case. He clarified that he had indeed advised Attorney General George Savvides to pursue prosecutions under legislation that enforces the Council of Europe Convention on the Criminalisation of Corruption.
Paschalidis expressed his confusion over the conclusions drawn by some critics, stating, “On the basis of what facts do some conclude that with my finding I acquit and absolve everyone and everything?” He noted that his findings indicated that criminal offenses had been committed by several individuals, warranting legal action.
The investigator felt compelled to publicly defend his integrity and the integrity of his work, citing a “distortion” of his findings aimed at serving political interests. He stressed that his role was strictly that of a criminal investigator, operating under specific terms of reference, and not as the head of an investigative committee with a broader political or ethical mandate. “My role was exclusively that of a criminal investigator,” he asserted, criticizing critics for either misunderstanding or deliberately misrepresenting his position.
Paschalidis also addressed the decision not to publish the full report, explaining that while he had no objection to its release, doing so prior to any decision on prosecutions could jeopardize the presumption of innocence for those involved. He rejected accusations that he had neglected the political or moral dimensions of the affair, stating that such considerations were beyond the scope of his mandate.
The timing of the report's submission, which coincided with the expiration of Paschalidis's appointment, was also clarified. He explained that extending the investigation after its conclusion would have been unjustified. While his report found no offenses under the criminal code, he maintained that his evaluation of the evidence led him to conclude that violations under the anti-corruption convention had indeed occurred.
This statement from Paschalidis follows significant criticism from opposition parties after the findings were made public earlier in the week. The Democratic Rally (Disy) party has called for the Legal Service to review the findings and assess whether any criminal offenses have occurred, while also advocating for a distinction between legal responsibility and political accountability. Conversely, the left-wing party Akel has accused the government of attempting to evade accountability and has called for the full report to be published through the House institutions committee.
In addition, Paschalidis addressed concerns regarding his appointment as president of the watchdog tasked with investigating complaints against the police (Aadipa). He firmly rejected suggestions that his appointment was a result of a deal with President Nikos Christodoulides, stating that he did not personally know the President and that his appointment followed a legal recommendation by the attorney general.
Concluding his statement, Paschalidis affirmed that he had executed his duties “without fear or prejudice,” urging anyone who questions his integrity to speak out, or else to remain silent. His comments underscore the ongoing complexities and political sensitivities surrounding the Videogate affair, as calls for accountability and transparency continue to resonate in the public discourse.