World

Sabalenka defends Wimbledon prize protest, says it’s for struggling players

Al Jazeera · 2026-06-27

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: Aryna Sabalenka, the world number one and top seed at Wimbledon, defended a protest by leading players regarding prize money, despite the tournament's record 20 percent increase in its prize pool for 2026. • Why it matters: The protest aims to improve financial conditions for lower-ranked players, as the current prize money distribution still falls short of the players' advocated 16 percent of tournament revenue. • What to watch next: As Wimbledon progresses, attention will be on the ongoing discussions about player welfare and financial distribution in tennis, particularly how it affects both top and lower-ranked players.

**Title: Aryna Sabalenka Defends Prize Money Protest Ahead of Wimbledon**

**By CyprusDailyLife News Team**

Wimbledon, England – Aryna Sabalenka, the world number one and top seed at Wimbledon, has publicly defended a protest regarding prize money initiated by leading players, despite the tournament announcing a record 20 percent increase in its prize pool for this year. The Belarusian player emphasized that the protest is aimed at improving conditions for lower-ranked players rather than for the benefit of top competitors.

The total prize money for Wimbledon in 2026 has reached £64.2 million ($84.7 million), which represents about 15 percent of the tournament's revenue. This figure falls short of the 16 percent that players, including Sabalenka, have been advocating for, which would equate to approximately £70 million ($92.4 million).

Sabalenka, who is part of a group represented by former WTA chief executive Larry Scott, expressed her hope that the players' concerns would lead to meaningful discussions about player welfare and financial distribution in the sport. During a recent press conference, she acknowledged the increase in prize money but pointed out that when compared to figures from 2016, the percentage of revenue allocated to players has not improved significantly.

“It’s a great start, they raise the prize money. It’s an amazing start,” Sabalenka stated. “If you look over the last 10 years, if you compare the prize money to 2016, it’s kind of like the same [as a percentage] because it went down.” She added that her goal is to reach a resolution that satisfies all parties involved, hoping that this would be the last time such a protest would be necessary.

The prize for winning Wimbledon this year is set at £3.6 million ($4.7 million), an increase from the £3 million ($4 million) awarded to the champions in 2025. Additionally, first-round losers will see their earnings rise to £80,000 ($106,000), up from £66,000 ($87,100).

When questioned about the potential disconnect between the complaints of top players—many of whom are multimillionaires—and the public's perception, given the rising costs of tickets and food, Sabalenka clarified the intention behind the protest. “We do it for the tour, we don’t do it for ourselves,” she said. “We do it for the rest of the players who are suffering to even hire a coach. It’s not an easy life for lower-ranked players.”

The All England Club, which organizes Wimbledon, expressed its disappointment regarding the protest, stating that it was “surprised and disappointed” by the actions of the players. The club highlighted that this year's increase in prize money is the largest in the event's history and noted its ongoing investment of hundreds of millions of pounds in player facilities to enhance the experience for competitors.

As Sabalenka prepares for her matches at Wimbledon, she is also working to regain her confidence following a challenging performance at the French Open, where she lost her last ten games in a quarterfinal match against Russian player Diana Shnaider. She has since sought assistance from her psychologist to help her move past that experience. “Overall, I feel like things are clicking back together,” she remarked.

As the tournament progresses, the focus will remain on the balance between rewarding top players and ensuring that lower-ranked athletes receive adequate support and compensation, a topic that continues to spark debate within the tennis community.

Source: Al Jazeera
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
World

Lebanon divided over framework agreement signed in Washington

• What happened: A framework agreement was signed between Israel and Lebanon in Washington, aimed at resolving maritime border disputes and resource allocation ...

World

Latest news bulletin | June 27th, 2026 – Evening

• What happened: Severe weather events have caused significant challenges across Europe, including a woman being rescued from a flooded sinkhole, while geopolit...

World

Israeli drone attack kills young girl in Gaza safe zone

• What happened: An Israeli drone attack in Khan Younis, Gaza, killed a young girl and another Palestinian, injuring four others, despite a designated ceasefire...

World

Bosnia: The lilies and dragons of the World Cup

• What happened: Bosnia and Herzegovina qualified for the World Cup knockout stage for the first time in history after defeating Qatar on June 24, 2026, sparkin...

World

Hezbollah rejects Israel-Lebanon agreement as Israeli attacks hit south

• What happened: Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem rejected the recent framework agreement between Israel and Lebanon, labeling it as humiliating and a surrender of ...

World

With water cuts looming in Arizona in US, locals fight data centres

• What happened: Residents in Tucson, Arizona, are protesting against two large data centers, known as Project Blue, due to concerns over water consumption amid...