World

Top US lawmaker Mike Johnson says lying is part of some Iranians’ religion

Al Jazeera · 2026-09-02

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: US House Speaker Mike Johnson suggested that lying is part of some Iranians' religion while defending President Trump's decision to engage in military conflict with Iran. • Why it matters: Johnson's remarks come amid growing public disapproval of the war, which has significant implications for the Republican Party's prospects in the upcoming midterm elections and has contributed to rising oil prices and inflation in the US. • What to watch next: Monitor developments in the Iran conflict, including potential responses from US allies and any shifts in public opinion regarding military actions against Iran as the midterm elections approach.

SaveSharefacebookxwhatsapp-strokecopylinkUS House Speaker Mike Johnson has repeatedly argued that conflict with Iran was necessary [Aaron Schwartz/Reuters]By Al Jazeera StaffPublished On 2 Sep 20262 Sep 2026Mike Johnson, the speaker of the United States House of Representatives, has suggested that lying is part of Iranians’ religion as he defended President Donald Trump’s decision to launch a war on Iran.Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Johnson was asked about the increasingly unpopular policies under the Republican president, including his decision to join Israel in launching a war against Iran in February.Recommended Stories list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3Qatar says efforts under way to end Iran-US war and reopen Strait of Hormuzlist 2 of 3Iran says it responded with missiles to US attack despite Trump’s threatslist 3 of 3Israel’s multiple wars see finance, defence ministries clash over spendingend of listThe House speaker responded by praising Trump, saying the US president has “steady hands at the wheel”. After addressing the US trade war with Canada, he turned his attention to the Iran war.“The problem has been – and the reason we’ve been frustrated – is that the Iranians simply cannot be trusted. They’ll sit at a negotiation table and say something. They’ll walk away and do the opposite,” Johnson said.“For some of them, it’s, you know, apparently part of their religion that they can just lie to someone they disagree with, so that’s been a difficult thing.”Lying is strictly forbidden in Islam. Johnson’s office did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment by time of publication.The war in Iran has been unpopular with the US public. On Monday, a nationwide University of Massachusetts poll suggested that 54 percent of Americans disapprove of US military actions against Iran.The conflict is expected to hurt Republicans’ chances of retaining control of the House and the Senate in November’s midterm elections.The conflict saw Iran shut the Strait of Hormuz, sending oil and gas prices soaring both in the US and around the globe. But the Trump administration and its allies have repeatedly argued that the war was necessary to address an “imminent” nuclear threat from Tehran.In Tuesday’s news conference, Johnson returned to that argument, saying that the war was “necessitated” because Iran was close to obtaining a nuclear weapon.That argument, however, has been undermined by statements from within the US government.In June last year, for instance, Trump’s then-intelligence chief, Tulsi Gabbard, told lawmakers that Iran was not weaponising its nuclear programme.“The IC [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorised the nuclear weapons programme that he suspended in 2023,” Gabbard said at the time.Within days of her remarks, on June 22, 2025, the US military bombed Iran’s three main enrichment facilities, an attack Trump repeatedly said had “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear programme.The US and Israel attacked Iran again late in February, sparking an all-out regional war that Trump had promised would last six weeks at most.But the conflict entered its seventh month last week with no end in sight.Although US officials have said that Washington has loosened Tehran’s grip on the Strait of Hormuz and succeeded in getting millions of barrels of oil through the waterway daily, American consumers are still paying high prices for petrol.The increased energy costs have also fuelled overall inflation in the US economy.But Johnson argued that Washington’s allies will get involved in the conflict to help reopen the strait, something they have refused to do so far.“Right now, the Strait of Hormuz – we have to have stability there for commerce, and in the Red Sea and in the region,” he said.“Other countries around the world, our NATO allies, the Arab states in the region – they have a bigger stake in that than Americans do. And I think they’re willing to assist in that regard to make sure that commerce stays open, so we have stability in the markets.”

Source: Al Jazeera
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
World

Honduran court drops case against ex-President Hernandez after Trump pardon

• What happened: A Honduran court dropped charges against former President Juan Orlando Hernandez, who had been accused of fraud and money laundering related to...

World

What to know about Germany’s drone attack accusations against Russia

• What happened: Germany has accused Russia of attempting a drone attack at Leipzig-Halle airport, where an explosive-laden drone was discovered near a Ukrainia...

World

Iran says US bombed a wedding party in Sirik, killing five

• What happened: Iran has accused the United States of bombing a wedding celebration in Sirik, resulting in the deaths of at least five people, including a chil...

World

IAEA says Syria built a nuclear reactor in Deir Az Zor under al-Assad

• What happened: The IAEA confirmed that Syria attempted to construct a nuclear reactor in Deir Az Zor under former President Bashar al-Assad, with findings fro...

World

US launches new strikes on Iran, denies its bases hit in Jordan

• What happened: The US launched new airstrikes on Iran's southern coast near the Strait of Hormuz, prompting Iranian forces to retaliate by targeting US b...

World

US pushes looser approach to AI regulation, while EU pushes new law

• What happened: The US and EU are diverging in their approaches to AI regulation, with the US advocating for looser constraints at a G20 meeting, while the EU ...