World

UK diplomats no longer get hardship bonus for being posted to Buenos Aires

BBC World · 2026-08-14

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: The UK government has removed hardship payments for British diplomats stationed in six locations, including Buenos Aires and Santiago, which were previously considered dangerous or challenging postings. • Why it matters: This decision has sparked criticism from Conservative party members who argue that it is unfair for taxpayers to fund additional payments for civil servants in cities that are also popular tourist destinations. • What to watch next: Monitor reactions from the Foreign Office and potential changes in policy regarding hardship payments, as well as any implications for the civil service if the Conservative party returns to power.

Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Buenos Aires hosts the official workplace of the Argentinian president, shown here in front of Plaza de Mayo squareByJennifer McKiernanPolitical reporterPublished14 August 2026, 17:42 BSTUpdated 14 minutes agoBritish diplomats in six locations around the world, including Buenos Aires and Santiago in South America, will no longer get hardship payments for working in dangerous cities.Bonuses and respite breaks are granted to those working in cities considered risky, like Beirut in Lebanon, or with high crime, such as Pretoria in South Africa, or high air pollution in cities including New Delhi and Beijing.The UK government has removed Santiago, in Chile, Panama City in Panama, Pyongyang in North Korea, Bamako in Mali, and Sarajevo in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in addition to the two south American cities, according to the latest list published last week, external.The 144 locations still on the list include many trouble spots but also popular holiday destinations such as Bali and Rio De Janeiro, prompting criticism from the Conservatives. Tory chairman­ Kevin Hollin­rake said civil servants receiving extra pay for working in such areas is unfair on the taxpayer.The Foreign Office has given civil servants extra payments for working in areas where there is a high level of danger, or high risks to health, for the past 30 years.They are meant to compensate staff and families for the additional costs and challenges of living overseas in difficult locations and are reviewed regularly.Factors and risks covered by the allowance include security measures, climate, natural disaster, isolation and other impacts on quality of life. Amounts are not routinely published but in 2009, the last time a breakdown was released, the highest payments for civil servants and their spouses were for postings to Karachi, Pakistan, which was worth an extra £26,647, or £14,804 in Abuja, the capital of Nigeria. The hardship payment for being posted as part of a couple to Buenos Aires was £1,517 and Santiago was £777, according to the 2009 Diplomatic Services Allowances, external.Answering a parliamentary question from Tory peer Lord Moylan, external, Foreign Office minister Lord Wood of Anfield said assessments of hardship take into account factors that mean members of staff are required to take additional breaks for the benefit of their physical or mental health.He added: "These arrangements are not new, and indeed have applied consistently under successive governments for a number of decades."Bangkok, Cape Town, and Kuala Lumpur are still among the cities that qualify for hardship payments, alongside Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Muscat.Hollinrake said it was unfair that taxpayers were "footing the bill" for these destinations and pledged to cut the size of the civil service if Conservatives were returned to power."Whilst businesses and families are paying higher taxes to fund this government's policies, civil servants are being sent on taxpayer-funded jollies to places like Bali, Cape Town and the Maldives," he said."This kind of nonsense has no place in government."But the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office defended the scheme, with a spokesperson saying: "British diplomats serve their country around the globe, including in some of the toughest and most challenging physical and political environments in the world."We have a duty of care to ensure our staff are properly supported, and compensation and other provisions reflect the circumstances of the posting, as it would be in any private sector job."'Do not travel' advice for Dubai droppedPublished18 JuneEx-Foreign Office cat starts job in BermudaPublished5 February 2025Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.Related topicsForeign, Commonwealth and Development Office

Source: BBC World
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
World

Luigi Mangione admits shooting healthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York court

• What happened: Luigi Mangione pleaded guilty to the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in a Manhattan federal court, admitting to stalking and shoo...

World

Activists try to deliver aid to Palestinians in homes besieged by Israeli settlers

• What happened: Activists attempted to deliver aid to Palestinian families in Qusra, West Bank, who have been besieged by Israeli settlers since Sunday, with t...

World

Liverpool to sell minority stake to consortium including Jeff Bezos

• What happened: A consortium led by Jeff Bezos has reached a definitive agreement to acquire a minority stake in Liverpool FC, with Fenway Sports Group retaini...

World

Analysis: Israel’s government can’t disown West Bank settler violence

• What happened: Israeli settlers have been attacking Palestinian towns and villages in the occupied West Bank, with recent violence in Qusra leading to a rare ...

World

What’s next for far-right Reform UK after Farage’s by-election win?

• What happened: Nigel Farage of Reform UK won re-election in a recent by-election, but he is currently facing an inquiry into his financial dealings that could...

World

France's top court blocks social media ban for under-15s

• What happened: France's top court has overturned a ban on social media for individuals under 15, citing violations of freedom of expression. • Why it m...