World

US defence chief Hegseth puts Iran war cost at $37.5bn so far

Al Jazeera · 2026-07-21

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth testified that the cost of the ongoing U.S.-Israel war against Iran has reached $37.5 billion, an increase from previous estimates. • Why it matters: This figure highlights the significant financial burden of the conflict, which could have broader economic implications, as other assessments suggest the total impact may reach $150 billion due to rising energy prices and military operations. • What to watch next: Monitor developments in U.S. military strategy and budget proposals, particularly regarding funding for munitions and resources, as well as the ongoing tensions and military actions in the region.

**Title: US Defense Secretary Hegseth Estimates Iran War Costs at $37.5 Billion**

**Date: July 21, 2026**

In a recent Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth provided an updated estimate of the financial costs associated with the ongoing U.S.-Israel war against Iran, placing the figure at $37.5 billion. This figure marks an increase from previous estimates, including a $29 billion projection from the Trump administration in May.

During the hearing, Hegseth, alongside Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine, faced inquiries regarding a substantial $1.5 trillion defense budget request, which encompasses nearly $70 billion allocated specifically for the conflict with Iran. The Secretary confirmed that the $37.5 billion estimate includes operational and maintenance costs projected through the end of September, although he did not disclose detailed breakdowns of these expenses.

The figure presented by Hegseth is notably lower than other assessments. For instance, Moody’s Analytics has estimated that the broader domestic impact of the war, including factors such as rising energy prices, could reach as high as $150 billion. This discrepancy highlights the complexity of calculating the true costs of military engagements, which often extend beyond direct expenditures.

The hearing took place amid escalating tensions and ongoing military operations. Hegseth's testimony followed the collapse of a memorandum of understanding that had briefly halted hostilities since June 17. As military actions resumed, former President Trump indicated that Iran would "pay" for the recent deaths of U.S. soldiers, further escalating the rhetoric surrounding the conflict.

In the wake of renewed hostilities, Trump has threatened to target critical infrastructure in Iran, including energy plants and nuclear facilities. The U.S. military has focused its strikes on locations that Iran utilizes to project influence over the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. In retaliation, Iran has vowed to continue targeting U.S. assets in the region, with recent attacks reported in Kuwait, Bahrain, and Jordan, including assaults on desalination and power plants.

During the hearing, Hegseth also addressed concerns regarding the strain on U.S. military resources due to the ongoing conflict. He emphasized the need for increased funding to expand production capabilities for high-demand munitions, including solid rocket motors, Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs), and counter-drone technologies. Hegseth warned that without adequate budgetary support, future military training programs could be curtailed, highlighting the urgency of the current budget cycle.

Senator Patty Murray raised concerns about the extensive budget request, which also encompasses funding for various military operations, including National Guard deployments in Washington, D.C., and efforts against drug trafficking in the Caribbean. Murray expressed skepticism about the coherence of the budget proposal, questioning its overall rationale.

As the conflict continues, the implications of the war extend beyond military engagements, affecting both domestic economic conditions and international relations. The ongoing situation remains fluid, with military and political developments likely to influence future budgetary considerations and strategic decisions by U.S. leadership.

The Senate hearing underscores the complexities and challenges of managing military expenditures in a protracted conflict, as lawmakers grapple with the financial implications of U.S. involvement in the region.

Source: Al Jazeera
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
World

Moldova chooses new prime minister as it pushes for EU membership

• What happened: Moldova's parliament elected Vasile Tofan as the new prime minister with a vote of 53 to 21, ending a three-week political uncertainty fol...

World

Zelenskyy replaces Ukraine military chief after protests

• What happened: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy replaced military chief Oleksandr Syrskyi with Mykhailo Drapatyi following six days of protests in Kyiv...

World

Drone shows scorched landscape after Spain wildfire

• What happened: A wildfire in central Spain has burned over 30,000 hectares of forest, leading to the evacuation of residents in 34 municipalities amid a sever...

World

Iran holds funerals for children killed in Minab school strike

• What happened: Iran held funerals for 32 children killed in a US airstrike on a school in Minab on February 28, which resulted in at least 170 fatalities. •...

World

How will Khalil al-Hayya’s leadership shape Hamas?

• What happened: Khalil al-Hayya has been appointed as the new leader of Hamas, succeeding a five-man council that led the group for nearly two years. • Why i...

World

Guyana reports ferry disaster death toll rises to 41

• What happened: The death toll from a ferry disaster off the coast of Guyana has risen to at least 41, with 14 additional bodies recovered following the capsiz...