World

US judge blocks Trump subpoenas into transgender care at New York hospitals

Al Jazeera · 2026-06-24

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: A US federal judge blocked the Department of Justice from issuing subpoenas for the medical records of transgender patients who received gender-affirming care as minors in New York. • Why it matters: The ruling highlights concerns over patient privacy and the Trump administration's efforts to restrict transgender healthcare, which critics argue aim to marginalize transgender individuals. • What to watch next: A follow-up hearing is scheduled for July 8 to determine whether to extend the temporary restraining order against the DOJ's access to the medical records.

SaveSharefacebookxwhatsapp-strokecopylinkThe US Department of Justice has been told to 'prioritize' a Trump administration push to restrict gender-affirming care [File: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo]By Reuters and The Associated PressPublished On 24 Jun 202624 Jun 2026A United States federal judge has blocked the Department of Justice (DOJ) from issuing subpoenas for the medical records of transgender patients who received gender-affirming care as minors from providers in New York.On Wednesday, District Judge Katherine Polk Failla issued a temporary restraining order to prevent access to the confidential files.Recommended Stories list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3US court upholds injunction against Trump policy banning transgender troopslist 2 of 3US federal employees file complaint against Trump’s anti-transgender policylist 3 of 3Olympics align with Trump as transgender athletes banned from women’s gamesend of listHer decision comes after a hospital disclosed that it had been subpoenaed by Justice Department officials, and several families and patients filed a lawsuit in response.Failla noted that the subpoenas, undertaken by the administration of President Donald Trump, could constitute a violation of patient privacy.“Whether by accident or by design, the administration’s policies vis-a-vis transgender persons embody a concerted effort to obtain deeply private information about an entire class of individuals without their knowledge or consent,” the judge said in her ruling.Since returning to office for a second term, Trump has led a crackdown on transgender protections.On his first day back in the White House, the Republican leader issued an executive order directing the federal government to reject the idea of gender and only recognise two sexes: male and female.He followed that order with a series of policy changes to restrict transgender access and services. On January 28, 2025, he signed a directive to restrict gender-affirming care for transgender youth.As part of that order, he also called on the Department of Justice to “prioritize investigations and take appropriate action to end” such healthcare practices.Shortly thereafter, in February 2025, the Pentagon issued a memo to effectively ban transgender personnel from serving in the military, saying their gender was “incompatible with the high mental and physical standards necessary” for service.Critics have called the Trump administration’s efforts a concerted attempt to disparage and marginalise transgender people and cast doubt on the legitimacy of their identity. Failla echoed that assessment in her order on Wednesday.She said the administration has sought to “identify, to demonise, and ultimately to eradicate an entire population of transgender people”.Her current restraining order is scheduled to last for 14 days. Failla scheduled a follow-up hearing for July 8 to decide whether to issue a preliminary injunction to extend the block on the Justice Department’s access to confidential medical records.The subpoena to access the New York medical records was issued by a grand jury in the northern district of Texas, part of the federal court system seen as a sympathetic venue for conservative causes.Judges around the country, however, have blocked several of the nearly 20 subpoenas the Texas court has issued to clinics and doctors who provide transgender care.“Today’s order from the court is a victory for the basic privacy of our clients and all families like theirs across New York City,” Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the LGBTQ rights group Lambda Legal, said in a statement.

Source: Al Jazeera
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
World

Mehdi Taremi, assistant coach, held up at airport by US officials, Iran says

• What happened: Iranian footballer Mehdi Taremi and assistant coach Saeed Alhoei were delayed by U.S. officials for approximately 25 minutes while traveling to...

World

Palestinian activist faints after his release from Israeli prison

• What happened: Palestinian activist Abdullah Shatat fainted shortly after being released from an Israeli prison, where he had been held for 32 months without ...

World

Family sues Tesla for wrongful death in Autopilot crash in Texas, US

• What happened: The family of a Texas woman, Martha Avila, has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Tesla after she was killed when a Model 3, allegedly usin...

World

Zimbabwe’s Senate approves amendment extending presidential term

• What happened: Zimbabwe’s Senate approved a constitutional amendment extending President Emmerson Mnangagwa's term until 2030, with 75 votes in favor and...

World

US public health agency concludes hantavirus response as outbreak eases

• What happened: The CDC has concluded its response to a hantavirus outbreak linked to the MV Hondius cruise ship, which resulted in three fatalities but no sus...

World

Top European leaders vow ‘strong’ support for Ukraine ahead of NATO summit

• What happened: Top European leaders, including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron, met in Berlin to discuss strong support ...