World

US judge dismisses January 6 case against Proud Boys after Trump order

Al Jazeera · 2026-07-11

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: A US federal court dismissed seditious conspiracy cases against four Proud Boys members involved in the January 6 Capitol attack, following a government motion to dismiss the case with prejudice. • Why it matters: The ruling reflects ongoing tensions surrounding the prosecution of January 6 rioters and highlights the influence of political decisions on judicial outcomes, particularly in the context of former President Trump's actions and statements regarding the event. • What to watch next: Observers should monitor potential implications for future prosecutions related to the January 6 events, as well as any further legal actions or political maneuvers by Trump and his supporters in the wake of this ruling.

SaveSharefacebookxwhatsapp-strokecopylinkRioters supporting President Donald Trump storm the US Capitol in Washington on January 6, 2021 [John Minchillo/AP Photo]Published On 11 Jul 202611 Jul 2026A United States federal court has dismissed the seditious conspiracy cases against four members of the Proud Boys, the far-right group involved in the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.On Friday, Judge Timothy J Kelly, an appointee of President Donald Trump, granted the government’s motion to dismiss the case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be revived in future.Recommended Stories list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3Trump issues two pardons related to investigation into January 6, 2021 riotlist 2 of 3Witnesses contest the Trump administration’s account of Texas ICE killinglist 3 of 3Trump administration subpoenas New York Times reporters over coverageend of listBut Kelly made it clear that the defendants — Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl and Dominic Pezzola — had been “convicted of serious offences”.He wrote in his seven-page ruling that his decision was ultimately rooted in the separation of government powers, not in the merits of the case.“As the Court has said many times, the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021 was a perilous event. It was an attack on people, including police officers, many of whom were injured,” Kelly wrote.“It was an attack on the Constitution’s mechanism to facilitate the peaceful transfer of power from one president to the next,” he added.Inside the January 6 riotFriday’s ruling was yet another milestone in Trump’s efforts to end the prosecution of January 6 rioters.The attack on the Capitol came shortly after Trump lost his bid for re-election in 2020 to Democrat Joe Biden. But in the aftermath of his loss, Trump spread false claims that the election had been rigged.January 6, 2021, was the day Congress was scheduled to certify the Electoral College votes, confirming Trump’s defeat.His vice president at the time, Mike Pence, held a ceremonial role overseeing the certification that day. But behind the scenes, Trump reportedly pressured Pence to reject the results of the election.At midday, Trump held a “Save America” rally in front of the White House, repeating to his supporters that he had won “by a landslide”.“If Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election,” Trump said at one point. At another, he said, “If you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”Afterwards, some of his supporters marched to the Capitol and broke into the building, attacking police officers and causing millions of dollars worth of damage. Participants signalled their aim was to stop the vote certification, with some chanting, “Hang Mike Pence.”The attack proved to be deadly. One rioter was shot by police as she climbed through a broken window to enter the House Speaker’s Lobby. An officer died from a stroke the following day after being beaten. Others died by suicide after the attack. Members of Congress had to be led to safety.Under the Biden administration, the Department of Justice opened criminal cases against nearly 1,600 people involved.But Trump has long defended the rioters and called their prosecution a “national injustice”.Trump himself faced two criminal indictments — one at state level, the other federal — over his alleged attempts to subvert the election results, though the charges were dropped upon his re-election in 2024.Unravelling the prosecutionsCalling the January 6 prosecutions an example of government “weaponisation”, Trump had campaigned during the 2024 race on a promise to pardon the rioters.He followed through with that pledge on the first day of his second term. On January 20, 2025, Trump signed an executive order granting “a full, complete and unconditional pardon” to most of the defendants involved in the Capitol attack.Trump also commuted the sentences of 14 people, including Nordean, Biggs, Rehl and Pezzola. Under his authority, the Department of Justice also proceeded to seek the dismissal of ongoing January 6 cases.Judge Kelly cited that series of events in Friday’s ruling, though he appeared to express a measure of scepticism.“No one should mistake the Court’s granting of the Government’s motion for its agreement with those decisions,” Kelly wrote.In May 2023, a jury in Washington, DC, found Nordean, Biggs and Rehl guilty of charges including seditious conspiracy, alongside Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio.Pezzola, meanwhile, was found not guilty of seditious conspiracy, but he was convicted of several felonies, including assaulting a police officer. At sentencing, the four men received prison terms ranging from 10 to 18 years, with Pezzola receiving the lightest sentence of the group.But in weighing the future of the case against the four men, Judge Kelly explained that it was “hard to see” any other course forward other than dismissal.The court system, Kelly explained, cannot “compel” the executive branch to pursue prosecutions. Trump’s executive order had also required the Department of Justice to seek the case’s dismissal.“The Court will grant the motion because there are no grounds for it to withhold leave for the Government to dismiss the case with prejudice,” Kelly concluded.But he ended his decision with a word of warning about protecting the future of American democracy from further attacks.“Moving forward, if this Nation’s experiment in self-government is to last another 250 years, the American people — no matter their partisan preferences — will have to act together to preserve, protect and defend that miracle through our constitutional framework,” Kelly wrote.

Source: Al Jazeera
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
World

FIFA to sell pieces of World Cup final stadium pitch, could earn millions

• What happened: FIFA announced it will sell pieces of the pitch from the 2026 World Cup final at New Jersey's MetLife Stadium, starting at $450 per piece....

World

Argentina vs Switzerland LIVE: FIFA World Cup 2026 quarterfinal

• What happened: Argentina is facing Switzerland in the quarterfinals of the FIFA World Cup 2026, with Lionel Messi leading the Argentine team. • Why it matte...

World

UK police investigate murder of politician Ann Widdecombe

• What happened: UK police have launched a murder investigation following the death of former politician Ann Widdecombe, who was found at her home with serious ...

World

What’s behind Pakistan’s mass deportation of Afghans?

• What happened: Pakistan has intensified the deportation of undocumented Afghan migrants, citing national security concerns following the expiration of a gover...

World

Iran supreme leader calls for revenge after father's burial

• What happened: Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei called for revenge following the death of his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed ...

World

Polish PM pledges memorial to victims of WW2 'genocide' by Ukrainian nationalists

• What happened: Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk announced plans for a national memorial to victims of a "genocide committed by Ukrainian nationalists&qu...