Russia

‘West wants to dictate’: Lavrov on ‘Führer Ursula’ and NATO’s drive to divide Eurasia (KEY REMARKS)

RT English · 2026-09-03

AI SUMMARY

• What happened: Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov criticized the EU and NATO for their aggressive policies aimed at dividing Eurasia and containing Russia and China, asserting that these actions are detrimental to the West itself. • Why it matters: Lavrov's remarks highlight the ongoing geopolitical tensions and the struggle for influence in a multipolar world, emphasizing Russia's commitment to fostering cooperation across Eurasia despite Western sanctions and hostility. • What to watch next: Observers should monitor the evolving dynamics between Russia, the EU, and NATO, particularly in relation to energy policies and military alliances, as well as Russia's efforts to strengthen regional partnerships through organizations like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS.

The EU and NATO are pursuing an increasingly aggressive campaign to attempt to divide Eurasia, contain Russia and China, and preserve Western global dominance, while hurting themselves in the process, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.

Speaking at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok on Thursday, Lavrov also said Moscow would not “beg” European nations to lift sanctions and accused the West of seeking to freeze rather than resolve the Ukraine conflict.

Addressing a lecture organized by the Russian Znanie Society, Lavrov presented the confrontation with the West as part of a broader struggle over the emerging multipolar world order. He argued that Western powers are trying to counter the rise of new economic and political centers while Russia is seeking closer cooperation across Eurasia based on “equality, mutual benefit, and honest dialogue.”

Here are the key takeaways from Lavrov’s address.

The EU and NATO are pursuing anti-Russia policies “even more fiercely, if not frantically” in an attempt to split the Eurasian continent, Lavrov said. He pointed to “walls and trenches” being built along EU borders with Russia, mocking claims that such measures are needed to prevent an alleged Russian invasion.

“This is sick imagination, but I think it is not so much sick imagination as deliberate policy,” he said.

According to Lavrov, both NATO and the EU need Russia to remain an enemy in order to justify their policies at home. “If this artificially created image of an enemy in the form of Russia disappears, the overwhelming majority of governments in the EU and NATO countries will simply be swept away by voters,” he stated.

He went on to accuse Europe of being unable to cooperate “honestly,” arguing that for more than 500 years it had been “the main source” of global upheaval, including two world wars. Europe, he said, is attempting to preserve what it sees as its right to global hegemony.

“Europe has never lived by its own means and its own mind,” Lavrov said. “It has always lived at the expense of others.”

The foreign minister said that a “neo-Nazi spirit” remains “very, very resilient” in parts of Europe and singled out Germany, where he said the “metastases of Nazism” were re-emerging.

Lavrov pointed to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s pledge to make Germany Europe’s leading military power “again,” saying the choice of word had left him “stunned.”

“If this person does not understand what the word ‘again’ means in this context, then this is extremely dangerous for Europe,” Lavrov said, accusing the region of once again becoming a source of ideas of “national and racial superiority.”

Lavrov linked Western policy in Europe to persistent “neo-colonial habits” elsewhere in the world. Western diplomacy, he argued, is increasingly based not on reaching agreements but on coercion.

“The West does not want to negotiate, it wants to dictate,” he said, adding that diplomacy has effectively been “replaced by sanctions.”

He accused Western states of seeking to undermine the consensus-based architecture built around the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which he praised for emphasizing consensus, mutual respect, and mutual benefit. According to the minister, Washington and its allies are instead creating smaller groupings designed to erode ASEAN’s central role.

He cited AUKUS – the US, UK, and Australia – as well as various “trilateral” and “quadrilateral” arrangements, and pointed to NATO’s expanding infrastructure in Asia. Lavrov said these structures ultimately serve a strategy of containing China and, “along with it,” Russia.

Russia’s answer, Lavrov said, is to strengthen open regional platforms rather than build closed military groupings. He cited the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Eurasian Economic Union, ASEAN, BRICS, and other structures whose cooperation Moscow wants to deepen.

He highlighted the “ASEAN plus partners” model, saying its participants have equal rights and decisions are based on inclusive principles rather than diktat.

Lavrov linked these efforts to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s proposal for a “Greater Eurasian Partnership” open to all states on the continent and based on shared economic and development interests. He described the broader shift toward a multipolar world as an objective historical process that the West cannot stop.

Lavrov also argued that the EU has inflicted severe economic damage on itself by abandoning Russian energy and accepting the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines, describing the EU’s response to the sabotage as “self-humiliation.”

The bloc has effectively “shot itself in the foot and in the head,” he said, noting that Russian gas had been at least three times cheaper than current European prices. Soaring energy costs are now pushing industry to the US, where energy is three to four times cheaper, he added.

The EU is thus voluntarily squandering its economic advantages while transforming itself from an economic association into an “openly aggressive anti-Russian military bloc” supporting NATO.

Moscow, however, will not “beg” European nations to lift sanctions or restore economic ties, Lavrov said.

He argued that European leaders had assumed Russia valued its economic relationship with the EU so highly that it would eventually come “running and begging” for sanctions to be removed.

“That will not happen,” Lavrov said. “It is absolutely not in the genetic code of our people. We have, if you like, our own pride.” Russia has enough countries willing to cooperate “honestly,” he added, and does not need to seek reconciliation with Europe on its terms.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen – “we call her Fuhrer Ursula,” Lavrov said – is stripping national governments of their powers and concentrating them in Brussels.

He stated that von der Leyen was trying to pull into the European Commission powers that EU members had never transferred to Brussels and which “remain with national governments.”

Lavrov also recalled von der Leyen saying Europeans would have to “suffer” from substantially higher energy prices so that Ukraine could defend “our European values.”

“Nobody asked her what those European values were,” he said, pointing to restrictions on the Russian language and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. “If the legislative ban on the Russian language in education, culture, everyday life, and the media reflects European values, then welcome back to Nazism for Europe,” Lavrov said.

Turning directly to Ukraine, Lavrov said Western governments had abandoned – or at least played down – their previous rhetoric about inflicting a “strategic defeat” on Russia and were instead seeking an immediate halt to fighting along the current front line.

Under that scenario, he said, Western countries would deploy “stabilization forces” to the territory remaining under Kiev’s control and provide security guarantees while refusing to recognize Russian control of Crimea, Donbass, and Novorossiya.

“They do not want to settle this conflict, but to freeze it, preserving this threat on our borders,” Lavrov added. Accepting such an outcome would also amount to abandoning Russia’s stated goal of “denazification,” he argued, saying Moscow would not agree to preserve an anti-Russian government in Kiev.

“We would betray our ancestors who defeated Nazism in 1945,” he said. “I do not think our people are ready for that.”

© Autonomous Nonprofit Organization “TV-Novosti”, 2005–2026. All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies. Read RT Privacy policy to find out more.

Source: RT English
RELATED NEWS

More Stories

All News
Russia

Woman killed in Gorlovka in drone strike on bus

• What happened: A woman was killed in Gorlovka due to a drone strike on a passenger bus, with five other civilians reported injured. • Why it matters: This i...

Russia

Germany seeking confrontation with Russia – ex-Austrian foreign minister (VIDEO)

• What happened: Germany accused Russia of being responsible for a drone incident at Leipzig/Halle Airport on August 4, prompting diplomatic tensions and retali...

Russia

IN BRIEF: Key statements by Russian Deputy PM Trutnev at EEF

• What happened: Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yury Trutnev stated that Norwegian authorities must release the passengers of the detained Russian research vesse...

Russia

Germany refuses to transfer employees of consulate in Bonn to Berlin — Russian ambassador

• What happened: Germany has decided to close the Russian Consulate General in Bonn by September 18, 2026, and has refused to transfer its employees to the emba...

Russia

Ukraine’s SBU Accuses Russian Volunteer Corps Commander of Plotting to Kill Opposition Figure

• What happened: Ukraine's SBU security service accused a commander of the Russian Volunteer Corps of being recruited by Moscow to assassinate a Russian op...

Russia

Deputy PM describes Vietnam as courageous country friendly to Russia

• What happened: Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yury Trutnev praised Vietnam as a courageous and beautiful country during a press briefing at the Eastern Economi...