Why Europe want to break up with Big Tech?

World European UniontechnologyTop News Why Europe want to break up with Big Tech? Relevant News Why Europe want to break up with Big Tech? 3 July 2026 Things to do on Friday, July 3 3 July 2026 Economic growth halted due to geopolitical developments 3 July 2026 Theodosis Pipis 3 July 2026 FacebookXWhatsAppEmailPrintViber The European Union is making its clearest attempt yet to reshape the balance of power in the global technology industry. After months of delays, the European Commission on 3 June unveiled a package of measures designed to strengthen the bloc’s technological sovereignty, reflecting a growing conviction in Brussels that Europe’s dependence on foreign digital infrastructure has become both an economic weakness and a strategic vulnerability. The proposals spans cloud computing, artificial intelligence, semiconductors and open-source software, and together amount to a more interventionist industrial policy aimed at building domestic technological capacity. The strategy arrives against a backdrop of increasingly uncertain transatlantic relations and growing concern that Europe’s digital economy rests on infrastructure overwhelmingly controlled by a handful of US companies. While the EU has long sought greater autonomy in areas such as energy and defence, policymakers are increasingly extending the same logic to digital technologies, arguing that cloud infrastructure, AI models and semiconductor production have become strategic assets. Central to the package is the proposed Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA), which would establish a tiered sovereignty framework classifying cloud services according to their degree of independence from foreign ownership and legal jurisdiction. Under the proposal, the highest sovereignty classifications would be reserved for providers that are not controlled by non-EU governments or companies. Public procurement rules would also make it more difficult for non-European cloud providers, including Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure, to compete for sensitive public-sector contracts. The proposal marks one of the clearest signals yet that Brussels is prepared to use procurement policy to nurture a domestic cloud industry. Supporters argue that public purchasing power could help create demand for European providers that have struggled to compete against larger US hyperscalers with greater economies of scale. “While the proposed tiered sovereignty framework gives buyers a clearer basis on their preferred European providers,” Samuel Goodger, AI Policy Analyst at the European Policy Centre, (EPC) told en.philenews. “Its effect in practice will depend on how strictly the criteria are enforced, and on whether contracting authorities have the capacity to hold suppliers to them,” he added. Alongside cloud infrastructure, the Commission has proposed a second-generation Chips Act aimed at expanding Europe’s semiconductor industry. The initiative seeks to double the EU’s share of global semiconductor production to 20 per cent, accelerate project approvals to no more than 12 months, and create mechanisms that better connect European chip manufacturers with industrial customers. The package also identifies open-source software as a strategic asset rather than simply a development model. Brussels argues that greater adoption of open-source technologies can reduce dependence on proprietary foreign software while providing a foundation for European alternatives in cloud computing and artificial intelligence. The strategy further links digital sovereignty to the bloc’s climate agenda by encouraging the deployment of AI and digital technologies across the energy sector, presenting them as tools for improving both infrastructure resilience and decarbonisation. Taken together, the measures illustrate how Brussels’ understanding of technological competitiveness has evolved. Earlier initiatives, including the AI Act and the original European Chips Act, focused largely on regulation or supply-side investment. The new package places greater emphasis on creating domestic demand and using public procurement to shape markets, reflecting a broader “Made in Europe” approach that seeks to strengthen industrial capacity as well as technological innovation. Several developments have reinforced the Commission’s thinking. The rapid emergence of generative AI has concentrated computing power, cloud infrastructure and advanced AI models within a small group of predominantly US technology companies, including Microsoft, Amazon, Google and Meta. At the same time, geopolitical tensions, supply-chain disruptions and concerns over foreign jurisdiction over European data have heightened anxieties about the concentration of digital infrastructure beyond the EU’s control. European policymakers also argue that an increasing share of economic value is being captured by the owners of digital platforms rather than by the industries that rely on them. As artificial intelligence becomes embedded across manufacturing, healthcare, finance, energy and public administration, officials fear that European companies could become dependent on foreign providers for the core infrastructure underpinning future economic growth. The Commission’s response is not to sever ties with international technology companies, but to reduce one-sided dependence by expanding Europe’s own capabilities. The objective is to ensure that governments and businesses have viable alternatives in strategically important technologies while retaining more investment, intellectual property and high-skilled employment within the bloc. Whether the strategy succeeds, however, will depend less on its ambitions than on its implementation. Europe has announced several digital industrial initiatives over recent years, but translating policy into market outcomes has often proved more difficult. Domestic providers continue to face considerable scale disadvantages against established global competitors, while public-sector procurement remains fragmented across member states. “The building blocks for European preference in procurement are starting to take shape, but funding remains modest relative to the ambition,” Goodger says. “Efforts to move public administrations’ cloud and software stacks away from US hyperscale’s, towards European providers and open source, have been patchy. Germany and France are making progress, but coordination at EU level is still limited, and an EU instrument large enough to significantly shift market share is missing.” That tension may ultimately define Europe’s digital sovereignty agenda. The Commission has increasingly concluded that reducing technological dependence requires more than regulation: it requires building industrial capacity capable of competing with global incumbents. The latest package therefore represents not simply another set of digital policies, but a test of whether Europe can translate its regulatory influence into lasting technological and industrial strength. Read more: Social media platforms must take responsibility for the content posted on them, EU media chief says Subscribe to our Newsletter Latest News Things to do on Friday, July 3 Economic growth halted due to geopolitical developments Pedieos linear park may see cat shelters removed and rebuilt In the West Bank, Israeli settlers take over Palestinian’s dream home American Stories, on the eve of the 250th Anniversary Forty killed as bus falls into ditch in Pakistan’s Balochistan On this day: Jim Morrison, lead singer of The Doors, dies in Paris in 1971 Follow en.philenews on Google News and be the first to know all the news about Cyprus and the world.