**Title: Avakoum Monks Demand Trial Within a Trial Amidst Legal Challenges**
The ongoing trial of two monks from the Osiou Avakoum monastery, Nektarios and Porfyrios, continued on Tuesday at the Nicosia criminal court, with significant developments regarding the admissibility of evidence presented by the prosecution. The monks face multiple charges, including conspiracy to defraud, forgery, the use of false documents, theft by proxy, handling stolen goods, money laundering, interfering with judicial proceedings, and submitting fraudulent tax returns. Both monks have denied all allegations against them.
During the proceedings, the defense attorneys raised objections to several pieces of evidence, arguing that they were obtained illegally by police. Central to their argument was the claim that police entered the monastery without a warrant, leading to the collection of evidence that the defense deems inadmissible. The defense specifically highlighted photographs of various items, including a briefcase, personal belongings, safes, cash-filled envelopes, religious symbols, holy relics, and crosses, which they assert were improperly taken from the monastery.
According to Nektarios’ attorney, these items were removed during a nighttime incident on March 5, 2024, when individuals allegedly trespassed into the monastery after its gates had closed. The attorney contended that these items were subsequently transferred to the Tamasos bishopric before coming into police possession. In light of these claims, the defense has called for a "trial within a trial" to determine the legality of the evidence collected.
The lead prosecutor responded by stating that if the defense wishes to pursue a trial within a trial, they must detail each item they claim was obtained unlawfully. Nektarios’ lawyer countered this by asserting that most of the contested items are the personal property of his client, while others fall under the monk’s legal management and possession. This assertion is crucial, as the prosecution's case hinges on the claim that the monks exploited these religious artifacts for personal financial gain.
The court listened to both sides and subsequently adjourned the hearing until Thursday, instructing the defense to specify which items they contest as evidence. Additionally, the court is expected to address a request from the monks to ease certain restrictions placed upon them, including the frequency of their required reporting to a police station. The monks are seeking greater flexibility to undertake religious pilgrimages abroad.
The case against the monks has garnered significant attention, particularly after authorities uncovered €800,000 in cash and allegations of fabricated miracles. Reports have also surfaced regarding CCTV footage of prohibited sexual acts, further complicating the legal situation. A parallel investigation by church authorities is examining whether the monks orchestrated fake religious events, such as bleeding crosses or myrrh weeping, to solicit financial donations from their followers.
As the trial progresses, the focus will remain on the admissibility of evidence and the implications of the monks' legal arguments. The upcoming court sessions are expected to provide further clarity on these issues and the overall direction of the case.